Behe, Intelligent Design, and “Folk Science” (Part IIa)

In a follow-up to his post on Behe’s conduct as a scientist (which I discuss here), Steve Matheson has now posted the second part of his critique, this time examining Behe’s “scientific” arguments regarding malaria. There will be a part IIb in the future.


One thought on “Behe, Intelligent Design, and “Folk Science” (Part IIa)

  1. Ouch! That’s got to leave a mark on Behe! Matheson’s critique is so clear that even I, a non-professional, can understand it. Thanks for the links.

Comments are closed.